In This Issue:
Quotes of the Week
“Students only learn when they are focused, engaged, and putting in effort.”
Michael Petrilli (see item #4)
“If there is one thing I know about struggling readers, it is that they get tired of struggling.”
Jacqueline Leathers in “The Power of Series Books for Struggling Readers” in The Reading Teacher, May/June 2020 (Vol. 73, #6, p. 813); Leathers can be reached at
“Too often, research does not inform classroom practice, and when it does, it can take up to 50 years to make an impact.”
Nora Vines, Jennifer Jordan, and Amy Broemmel (see item #9)
“How many of us are walking around with unhealed emotional wounds inflicted in junior high? And can we really trust our memories and the stories we’ve told ourselves about those memories?”
Shannon Hale in a review of And Then They Stopped Talking to Me: Making Sense of
Middle School by Judith Warner in The New York Times, May 10, 2020
“Appropriate displays of emotion can be an effective tool for change, especially when balanced with poise. Maintaining this balance lets people now that although the situation is fraught with feelings, it is containable.”
Ronald Heifetz, Marty Linsky, and Alexander Grashow (see item #6)
1. Doug Lemov on Combining Synchronous and Asynchronous Pedagogy
In one of his online “field notes,” author/educator Doug Lemov notes the advantages of two modes of learning that are top of mind these days:
– Synchronous – Builds connections with students, develops their habits of engagement and accountability, and allows the teacher to check for understanding in real time.
– Asynchronous – Allows students to work at their own pace on deeper assignments.
However, says Lemov, with synchronous classes, teachers are limited in the depth of learning they can assign, and too much Zoom work is exhausting. With asynchronous learning, it’s hard to know how students are doing and whether they need help.
Lemov describes how English teacher Eric Snider combined the two modalities and reaped the benefits of each (there’s a video segment of the class at the link below):
– Snider kicked off the lesson with an engaging 20-minute synchronous lesson on the novel the class was reading, playing an audiobook of a passage.
– He then set up students for independent work with a cue (“Get ready for a plot twist…”) and a provocative question.
– He kept the Zoom connection live and students remained on the line as they worked (some turned off their cameras).
– The directions remained on the screen for students to review.
– Snider monitored students’ work, giving brief compliments, letting them know he was available to help (“I’m here if you need me”), and inviting them to send him a chat if they needed more time.
– Then he brought the class back together to discuss how they did and review answers.
“(A)Synchrony in Action: Eric Snider’s Hybrid Lesson” by Doug Lemov in Teach Like a Champion, May 31, 2020
2. Why Remote Learning Has Been a Boon for Some Students
In this Edutopia article, Nora Fleming reports on conversations with dozens of teachers who have been surprised that some students who were not doing well before the pandemic are thriving now: for example, class clowns, students who are hyperactive, shy, or highly creative. “It’s been awesome to see some of my kids finally find their niche in education,” said a California high-school teacher.
That’s clearly not the norm, cautions Fleming. Many students are struggling with remote learning, there are homes without Internet, devices, or both, and it’s hard for teachers to replicate in-person dynamics. But a significant number of teachers described reasons that some students were doing better with online learning:
• Self-pacing – Learning at home has allowed students to work at a much more leisurely pace, often with a lot of choice in how they organize time – a welcome change from the relentless, micromanaged schedule of the normal school day. “The reason I enjoy online learning,” said one tenth grader in a class survey, “is because of the opportunity to structure my day efficiently. I am able to work out, relax, and complete the work in a timely manner, with no distractions.”
• Fewer activities – When school is in session, many secondary-school students are overscheduled– club activities during lunch, sports, after-school activities, volunteering, part-time jobs. With almost all of that shut down, there’s time to focus on schoolwork – and be less stressed. One high-school teacher called it “an amazing respite for so many students.”
• Lower stakes – With more-lenient policies on grading and the cancellation of standardized tests, students are under less pressure. Said a Virginia middle-school teacher, “One student told me he likes remote learning better because he no longer feels the extreme pressure of failing. He says that now that the pressure of state testing is off, he feels he can really learn.”
• Less bullying and chatter – According to one survey taken before the pandemic, at least 20 percent of students report being bullied at school; home learning provides a safe haven from most of that. For many students, socializing can be distracting – the pressure to “look good” and fit in socially. An Alabama psychology teacher said, “The online environment may allow for voices to be heard without the added bit of social anxiety.”
• Sleep – “I have the time to sleep eight hours a night every night,” said a California high-school junior. Enough said.
“Why Are Some Kids Thriving During Remote Learning?” by Nora Fleming in Edutopia, April 24, 2020
3. School Closures As an Opportunity for Young Adolescents to Flourish
In this New York Times article, author Judith Warner says that early adolescents seem to be hard-wired “to bond with friends, flirt, judge, rank, rebel, and separate into in-group and out-group peer hierarchies… Adults don’t tend to much like kids of middle-school age. They roll their eyes at us and snarl. They watch us with a gaze newly awakened to all our hypocrisies and foibles.”
But Warner is not convinced that meanness, social drama, and alienation from adults are inevitable for this age group. “Middle school is a time when all sorts of new abilities kick in,” she says: “new powers of observation, critical thinking, reason, and reflection. Believe it or not, there’s even a new capacity for empathy, and a strong sense of injustice.”
And all these latent abilities, Warner believes, can be unleashed during the pandemic. She’s hearing about kids who, not long ago, “were accusing parents of trying to ruin their lives by keeping them home,” but are now reading, pursuing new interests, researching the history of plagues, taking music lessons, inventing games (including Covidopoly), rediscovering old friends, even talking on the phone. And some middle-schoolers are finding their teachers’ online instruction not bad.
The key to some kids’ good side being unveiled during the pandemic, Warner believes, is less pressure. But not everyone gets that. “Schools need to cut them a break,” she says. “Assign less homework. Let kids take classes pass-fail, as many colleges are doing. Make teachers and guidance counselors available for Zoom, Facetime, or even just old-fashioned phone calls for support.” Of course some boundaries are needed to keep the negatives under control: for starters, how about schools and parents agreeing on limiting social media to certain times of day?
“Ease the Pressure on Our Middle Schoolers” by Judith Warner in The New York Times, May 3, 2020; Warner’s new book is And Then They Stopped Talking to Me: Making Sense of Middle School (Crown, 2020)
4. A Post-Pandemic Silver Lining for High-Schools?
In this Education Week article, Heather Hill (Harvard University) and Susanne Loeb (Brown University) explore how schools might deal with students’ predicted learning loss when schools reopen. Of course teachers deal with “summer slide” every year, reviewing what was supposed to have been learned the previous year and spiraling the curriculum to fill in forgotten or missed knowledge and skills. But learning gaps will be bigger after three months of remote learning, and will vary significantly depending on home advantages, how well schools managed online learning, and the degree of trauma experienced by students. Gaps may be especially problematic for the youngest students, who are usually on a steep learning curve with reading, writing, math, and social skills.
Hill and Loeb suggest the following steps when schools reopen, whatever configurations are used:
• Track down and reach out to students who disengaged from instruction while schools were closed, and make strenuous efforts to get them back into the fold.
• Have teachers at each level pass along to the next grade-level team what was not covered during remote learning.
• Have all teachers immediately check in on students’ emotional state and conduct quick, classroom-based assessments to get a handle on what students know and can do.
• Launch into grade-level content right from the start, rather than repeating material from the previous grade; missing knowledge and skills would then be assessed and backfilled in context.
• Provide effective tutoring for students who are struggling with new material – but don’t pull students out of core classes, which will make them fall further behind.
• Make the best use of instructional time throughout the year. This includes minimizing student and staff absences, cutting down interruptions to class time, keeping students working productively when they are not in school, and hiring effective substitutes.
“How to Contend with Pandemic Learning Loss” by Heather Hill and Susanne Loeb in Education Week, May 27, 2020; the authors are at firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com.
5. Addressing “Covid Slide” in the Fall
In this article in Phi Delta Kappan, Madora Soutter (Villanova University) remembers that as an elementary teacher, she was skeptical about measuring students’ social-emotional characteristics. She bridled at the idea of putting SEL data on a report card, compiling growth charts, and giving students stickers if they hit certain benchmarks. But her work with EL Education has brought a different perspective. This network of 150+ schools has begun to measure students’ social-emotional learning and equitable learning environments, with particular attention to how student subgroups are doing and whether EL’s explicit focus on character-education is bearing fruit. “Their measurement efforts,” says Soutter, “provide a promising example of how schools might reconcile their desire for concrete, formative data about individual students’ social and emotional development with an emphasis on the larger school environment and its contribution to making learning joyful.”
EL Education’s assessment toolbox addresses three character-building aspirations for the network’s students:
– Becoming effective learners – Measuring growth mindset and self-management;
– Becoming ethical people – Empathy, perspective-taking, and compassion;
– Contributing to a better world – Civic responsibility and civic empowerment.
School leaders in the EL network look at the character data to see how their schools are doing over time, and whether there are differences by student subgroup. Further data come from a walkthrough tool, which is used by school leaders and teachers to observe classrooms and nonacademic spaces and assess how well students’ social and emotional well-being is being supported by educators and peers.
“By examining survey data and walkthrough data in relation to one another,” says Soutter, “EL Education schools are able to identify patterns and red flags… What is the evidence that students are being kind and empathetic? How can the teachers within the school learn from each other’s practices? Is there evidence that social-emotional skills are transferring beyond the classroom (e.g., to lunch, recess, or pickup time)?” Data are discussed by staff and shared with students, looking for what’s going well and what needs to be improved. Importantly, this information is not used for high-stakes decisions such as ranking students, accountability, or comparing schools to each other.
Soutter is convinced of the value of accurately assessing social-emotional learning, especially since there are so many SEL programs being promoted, some of dubious quality. But she still remembers how she felt as a teacher. Sometimes, she says, educators and students “need to put those tools down, walk outside with our students, marvel at the clouds they are pointing to, and be joyful – and not try to measure it.”
“Measuring Joy: A Social Justice Issue” by Madora Soutter in Phi Delta Kappan, May 2020 (Vol. 101, #8, pp. 25-30), available to PDK members and for purchase; Soutter can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
6. Emotionally Intelligent Leadership in a Changing World
In this Harvard Business Review article, Ronald Heifetz and Marty Linsky (Harvard Kennedy School) and Alexander Grashow (Good Wolf Group) say the current health and economic crises will bring about permanent changes, demanding revised leadership practices. Specifically, leaders need to work with colleagues on adopting new practices, distribute leadership in order to draw on collective intelligence, and lead in emotionally intelligent ways. On the last point, Heifetz, Linsky, and Grashow suggest:
• Give yourself permission to be both optimistic and realistic. “This will create a healthy tension,” they say, “that keeps optimism from turning into denial and realism from devolving into cynicism.”
• Find sanctuaries where you can regain perspective. Stepping away in some way provides a chance to see whether you understand the work colleagues are doing – and if you’re asking too much of them.
• Debrief your workday with a confidant. Ideally this person is outside your organization and cares more about you than the issues at stake. You might speak with more than one confidant.
• Bring more of your emotional self. “Appropriate displays of emotion can be an effective tool for change, especially when balanced with poise,” say Heifetz, Linsky, and Grashow. “Maintaining this balance lets people know that although the situation is fraught with feelings, it is containable.”
• Don’t lose yourself in your role. “Achieving your highest and most noble aspirations for your organization may take more than a lifetime,” conclude the authors. “Your efforts may only begin this work. But you can accomplish something worthwhile every day in the interactions you have with the people at work, with your family, and with those you encounter by chance. Adaptive leadership is a daily opportunity to mobilize the resources of people to thrive in a changing and challenging world.”
“Leadership in a (Permanent) Crisis” by Ronald Heifetz, Marty Linsky, and Alexander Grashow in Harvard Business Review, Summer 2020 (pp. 10-17); Heifetz can be reached at email@example.com, Linsky at firstname.lastname@example.org.
7. Four Ways to Be a Leader When the Chips Are Down
In this Harvard Business School article, Robert Sutton (Stanford University) says two dynamics are often at work in boss-employee relationships. First, “People who gain authority over others tend to become more self-centered and less mindful of what others need, do, and say.” Second, subordinates “devote immense energy to watching, interpreting, and worrying about even the smallest and most innocent moves their superiors make.”
Sutton believes it’s possible for good leaders to avoid this “toxic tandem” by taking four basic steps:
• Providing predictability – When people know what’s likely to happen – including unpleasant events like layoffs – randomness is reduced and they can do their work without constant anxiety. A vivid example of this was air-raid sirens in London during World War II; they were so reliable that people felt comfortable going about their business when there wasn’t a siren.
• Increasing understanding – “If predictability is about what will happen and when,” says Sutton, “understanding is about why and how.” Leaders need to give detailed explanations for why major changes are being made. Humans react negatively to unexplained events and do much better if they have information that’s “simple, concrete, and repetitive.”
• Affording control – “People don’t embark on careers to feel powerless,” says Sutton. “The whole point of work is to achieve outcomes and have impact. That’s why people are so deeply frustrated when events seem to render them helpless.” Effective leaders delegate maximum autonomy over how and when things are done – and make a point of celebrating small wins.
• Showing compassion – When it’s necessary to deliver bad news, leaders need to put themselves in their colleagues’ shoes, understand their anxiety and fear, express genuine empathy, and take the time to answer questions. Maintaining people’s dignity is a major goal at times like these.
“How to Be a Good Boss in a Bad Economy” by Robert Sutton in Harvard Business Review, Summer 2020 (pp. 82-89); Sutton can be reached at email@example.com.
8. The Surprising Role of SAT Scores in College Admissions
In this New York Times article, author Paul Tough notes the growing number of colleges (most recently the University of California) that no longer require applicants to submit SAT and other test scores. Tough says this is a positive development, which is surprising. Why? Because it’s often argued that standardized tests level the playing field for disadvantaged students – that tests help colleges find brilliant low-income students in below-the-radar high schools.
That’s mostly not true, says Tough. In fact, tests tilt the playing field even more in favor of economically advantaged students. “The best predictor of college success overall is a simple one,” says Tough: “high-school grades. That’s because an impressive GPA shows a combination of innate talent and hard work, which is the formula for being successful in college. Significantly, GPA is much less correlated with family SES than test scores.
Tough divides high-school students into two groups and compares the impact of eliminating the SAT as an application requirement:
– Strivers – Students with impressive GPAs, reflecting hard work and diligence in high school, but comparatively low standardized test scores;
– Slackers – Students with lower GPAs but relatively high test scores; these students are “self-assured test takers,” says Tough, “who for one reason or another didn’t put as much effort into high school.”
A study by the College Board found that Strivers were much more likely to be female, black, Latina, working class, or poor; Slackers, on the other hand, were more often white, male, and well-off. Most important, Strivers did better in college than Slackers, with slightly higher freshman grades and retention rates.
So it’s very clear, Tough concludes, which students will benefit most from eliminating standardized test scores as part of the college admission process.
“Go Ahead, California, Get Rid of the SAT” by Paul Tough in The New York Times, May 21, 2020
9. What It Takes to Implement Developmental Word Study
In this article in The Reading Teacher, Nora Vines, Jennifer Jordan, and Amy Broemmel (University of Tennessee/Knoxville) say, “Too often, research does not inform classroom practice, and when it does, it can take up to 50 years to make an impact.” They believe that’s the case with spelling instruction, with many teachers continuing with the “tried-and-failed” practice of weekly, whole-class, one-size-fits-all spelling lists. The research supports a quite different approach: developmental word study – students work with customized lists, investigate word features, patterns, and meanings, and develop a deeper understanding of how spelling works to represent sound and meaning. The goal, say Vines, Jordan, and Broemmel, is for students to develop a “knowledge of words they can apply to their own contextual reading and writing.”
Based on their work with second-grade teachers in a high-poverty rural school who were willing to “flip the script,” the researchers suggest seven key practices for successfully implementing developmental word study:
• Knowing about spelling and language – This includes understanding orthography and the stages students go through. They suggest two texts: Words Their Way (Bear et al., 2019) and Speech to Print: Language Essentials for Teachers (Moats, 2010).
• Being good assessors – The key here is using a developmental spelling inventory to identify what students know, leveraging their strengths, continuously assessing progress, and using data to fine-tune instruction. This is the opposite of the common practice of focusing on deficits, which doesn’t provide helpful entry points for instruction.
• Differentiating – Teachers use assessments to form and tweak student groupings, evaluate which instructional methods are working, and adapt instruction as students progress.
• Deciding on instructional routines – Teachers make good decisions on whole-class modeling, mini-lessons, group work, learning stations, and individual and independent work. “We cannot reiterate enough,” say the researchers, “that we did not find one right way to effectively implement word study.”
• Integrating authentic tasks – Students need to use the words they’re learning in reading, writing, projects, and hands-on activities.
• Critically reflecting – Teachers learn by observing one another’s classes and discussing what they believe is working – and what isn’t.
• Embracing messiness – Developmental word study involves letting go of long-standing beliefs about how spelling should be taught and what a classroom should look and sound like. There’s less structure, more group work, more interaction, and, the authors believe, more student understanding and learning.
“Reenvisioning Spelling Instruction: Developmental Word Study Nonnegotiables” by Nora Vines, Jennifer Jordan, and Amy Broemmel in The Reading Teacher, May/June 2020 (Vol. 73, #6, p. 711-722); the authors can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, and firstname.lastname@example.org.
10. The Virtues of a Clear Mission
“The principalship is a most unique position,” says author/consultant Kenneth Williams in this article in All Things PLC. When he first became a school leader 20 years ago, Williams felt overwhelmed by the “sheer responsibility” he had, the number of priorities and stakeholders, and the fact that each day was, as one colleague put it, “one constant interruption.” But a workshop with Richard DuFour a few years earlier had given Williams a clear sense of mission, which provided him and his colleagues three gifts:
• Quieting the noise – “In the day of a school leader,” says Williams, “there are so many issues careening your way from at times several stakeholder groups that everything appears to be high priority.” But having learned from DuFour the centrality of getting teacher teams working as professional learning communities, he had a clear idea of what mattered.
• Clarity of purpose – “Ensuring high levels of learning for all kids, regardless of background, was our compelling why,” says Williams, “and it served as our school’s North Star. Every decision we made was done in the context of our shared purpose.” The school went from a Babel of 65 “positive but different purposes” to one unifying purpose.
• A theory of action – Teacher teams focused on DuFour’s four key questions: (a) what do we expect all students to know and be able to do? (b) how will we know when they’ve learned the essential content? (c) how do we respond when they haven’t learned the essential content? and (d) how do we respond when they have learned the essential content? “Our commitment to answer these questions made clear the processes we needed to put in place,” says Williams:
– Assembling a “guiding coalition” to move the work forward schoolwide;
– Building shared knowledge around the cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment;
– Establishing collaborative teacher teams;
– Creating time for teams to meet;
– Helping teams establish SMART goals, both short- and long-term;
– Blocking out time to accelerate the learning of struggling students – and enrich the learning of students who have exhibited mastery.
“The Three Gifts of Mission” by Kenneth Williams in All Things PLC, Spring 2020; Williams can be reached at email@example.com.
11. Makerspaces: Possibilities and Caveats
In this article in Phi Delta Kappan, Kurt Salisbury (Midway Middle School, Texas) and Philip Nichols (Baylor University) define makerspaces as places where students “design or create projects using a variety of physical and digital tools” with an emphasis on “hands-on learning through imaginative tinkering and play.” There’s been a lot of enthusiasm for the idea over the last 16 years, but not all makerspaces have been successful, including some expensive, high-tech rooms that sit unused because teachers and students aren’t sure how they fit in with standards and their schools’ strategy. There has been some research on the potential of makerspaces, say Salisbury and Nichols, but not much about learning results.
At their best, say the authors, makerspaces “empower students to bring their interests and identities into content-area learning” in ways that deepen learning and align with standards. They suggest four key components of makerspace units:
– Projects – requirements are broad enough so students can have real ownership;
– Passion – students bring their interests and identities to the work;
– Peers – collaboration is a key component;
– Play – the climate is safe for experimentation, risk-taking, and just plain fun.
Picking up on these principles, Salisbury and Nichols broaden the conventional understanding of makerspaces with two examples: middle-school math students competing to build catapults that can fire projectiles the greatest distance, and high-school humanities classes restructuring each curriculum unit (including one on religious freedom) into a “playlist” of activities organized around the school’s design process: discover, design, develop, and deliver.
Excited as they are about the potential of makerspaces in schools, Salisbury and Nichols conclude with these cautions and takeaways. First, it’s not about the space or tools, and a lot of money can be misspent if that’s the focus. Second, some students may be disoriented or overwhelmed by such an open-ended learning environment. Finally, schools need to create alternative assessments. “Open-ended projects do not lend themselves to standardized evaluations,” they say; “therefore, they open educators to reflection about how else we might understand students’ learning.”
“School MakerSpaces: Beyond the Hype” by Kurt Salisbury and Philip Nichols in Phi Delta Kappan, May 2020 (Vol. 101, #8, pp. 49-53); the authors can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com.
12. Short Items:
a. Talking to Young People About Covid-19 – This tip sheet from the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress in Maryland has suggested scripts for explaining the pandemic to preschoolers, school-age children, and teens: what it is, how we protect ourselves, and how we protect people who are at risk.
Spotted in “How to Talk to Students About the Coronavirus Without Scaring Them” by Angela Duckworth in Education Week, May 27, 2020
b. Online Writing Prompts – The 826LA website has numerous suggestions to get students writing, organized by grades 1-5 and 6-12.
“826LA” May 2020
© Copyright 2020 Marshall Memo LLC